Leadership

Grammar Schools In England: A New Analysis Of Social Segregation And Academic Outcomes

This study by Durham University suggests that Grammar schools perform no better than non-selective state schools, once their pupils' higher ability and wealth is taken into account.

Once the pupil intake of grammar schools is taken into account based on factors such as chronic poverty, ethnicity, home language, special educational needs, and age in the year group, the Durham University analysis shows that grammar schools are no more or less effective than other schools.

The study also showed that pupils attending grammar schools, on average, are far less likely to have special educational needs and are less likely to have English as an additional language.

Once these differences are accounted for, grammar school pupils attain about the same as equivalent pupils in the rest of the country.

The research not only looked at the social backgrounds of grammar pupils, but also:

  • rates of chronic poverty
  • ethnicity
  • home language
  • special educational needs
  • age in the year group

The findings suggest England’s grammars take only a tiny proportion of pupils who are, or have been, eligible for free school meals.

This is important, say the researchers, because such pupils’ results tend to decline with every year they are on free meals.

<--- The article continues for users subscribed and signed in. --->

Enjoy unlimited digital access to Teaching Times.
Subscribe for £7 per month to read this and any other article
  • Single user
  • Access to all topics
  • Access to all knowledge banks
  • Access to all articles and blogs
Subscribe for the year for £70 and get 2 months free
  • Single user
  • Access to all topics
  • Access to all knowledge banks
  • Access to all articles and blogs